Blackout over a Reverse

This method, also called Blackout Over Reverse Bids, is employed by the partnership when a one-over-one response by the partnership is followed by a reverse bid by the opener on the two level. The developed Blackout method provides a response method for such a bidding sequence.

Note: The responder may not be a passed hand. The state of vulnerability is not an issue. The response method may not be employed if the opponents compete in a manner, which makes the employment of the method impossible.

Note: There is no universal consensus for the minimum values needed for a reverse bid. For purposes of presenting this response method the reverse bid is defined as being 16-19 high card points.

Several Definitions of a Reverse Bid.

The concept, as developed, has several responses, which require additional explanations. In this presentation all examples will show an opening of 1C and a reverse by the opener of 2S.

Example 1

SKQxx HAx xx CAKxxx

Sxxx HKQxxx xxx CQx

1C Pass 1H Pass
2S* Pass 3H**

* A reverse bid promising at least a 5-card Club suit and a 4-card Spade suit, plus minimum values of 16 high card points.

**If the responder rebids his own suit, then this rebid shows 5 or more cards in Hearts. This rebid is forcing for one round, but does not necessarily promise additional values. The reverse bidder is forced to rebid again.

Example 2

SKQxx HAx Dxx CAKxxx

Sxxx HKxxx DQJxx C xx

1C Pass 1H Pass
2S Pass ?*

* A rebid of 2NT, which is one round forcing, promises exactly 4 cards in the originally bid suit, Hearts, and minimum values. (Note: this rebid strongly implies a stopper(s) in the Diamond suit and that the holding is not suitable for a suit contract. The cheapest bid of the fourth suit (3D), which is one round forcing, promises exactly 4 cards in the originally bid suit, Hearts, and minimum values.

Example 3

SKQxx HAx Dxx CAKxxx

Sxxx HKJxx Dxxx CQxx

1C Pass 1H Pass
2S Pass 3C*

* This rebid by the responder is to play, however a bid of 3D (The cheapest bid of the fourth suit is considered to be (game) forcing with Clubs as the implied trump suit.)

Note: These complementary explanations to Blackout are necessary for the overall understanding of the concept. Also, if the responder takes a preference to the opening bid suit, which is Clubs in this example, or raising the second suit of the opening bidder (Spades) are both game forcing, natural, and accompanied with the understanding that they show a mild slam interest.

Note: Since the reverse suit may be different the similarities of the bids of the responder are apparent.

Possible Reverse Auctions

The chart below shows all possible reverse bids to the two level. The Blackout conventional response method must be altered accordingly to accommodate the various possibilities. This presentation does not illustrate or describe each possible reverse bid.

Reverse Bid from Clubs to Diamonds

The guidelines for the employment of the Blackout conventional response method are shown below and deal only with a reverse bid from Clubs to Diamonds. The reverse bid sequence is presented and then the possible rebids of the responder clarifying the holding are listed.

1C - 1S - 2D. Responses are:

Reverse Bid from Diamonds to Hearts.

The guidelines for the employment of the Blackout conventional response method are shown below and deal only with a reverse bid from Diamonds to Hearts. The reverse bid sequence is presented and then the possible rebids of the responder clarifying the holding are listed.

1D -1S - 2H. Responses are:

The other reverse bid sequences are similarly constructed and are not presented. The partnership should discuss such continuances along the same lines of the above response methods and include these responses in their partnership agreement.

Note: There are several modifications of this concept as a response method following a reverse bid. The bridge student will find several forum discussions online and can review the comments and observations at these specific forums with other bridge players. The advantages and possible disadvantages of the response method are discussed and examined, and the flaws to several aspects of the conventional response method are revealed and perhaps even altered to satisfy individual partnership agreements.